Self-Policing Vs. Regulation, and the Free Speech Bridge Controversy
Posted by ~Ray @ 2008-09-29 02:36:14
Also my previous posts on that blog have attracted comments. In my response to one of yesterday’s comments. I brought up the who have been accused by other bridge players of treason and sedition for holding a sign at the awards ceremony in Shanghai declaring that they did not choose for Bush.
come up it may not be to the liking of some conservative bridge players but it’s a long way from the definition of treason or sedition. One could actually alter more of a inspect that bush and some of his cronies have committed treason.
Last time I checked it as enshrined in the Constitution (specifically the First Amendment) that Americans undergo a right to free speech. Whether or not this was an appropriate forum could be discussed (especially in the context of the self-regulation versus outside regulation question I raised on the IAOC blog) but the alter not to be silenced is guaranteed at least in theory.
overlap and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
A blog about business ethics from Shel Horowitz expert on business ethicsas a success driver. This blog covers the intersections of ethics,politics media marketing and sustainability.
About Shel: Copywriter marketing and publishing consultant speaker andaward-winning author of seven books. The three most recent are and.
Shel specializes in affordable ethical and effective marketing forauthors publishers small businesses nonprofits and community groups.
He's currently engaged in a campaign to get 25,000 populate to sign--and spread--the Business Ethics Pledge: [ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/self-policing-vs-regulation-and-the-free-speech-bridge-controversy/2007/11/16/
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
